PETITION IN SUPPORT OF A MORATORIUM

FROM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS CONCERNING THE RNA VACCINE.

Sign nowSign now

Read the text of the petition
Send a donation

 

A petition initiated by MSLC, Tous-plus, Les Amis de la Constitution,
Le Collectif citoyen NE and the Réseau Choix Vaccinal

 

 

 

Sign the peition

We take protecting your personal details very seriously and these will remain fully confidential.

Add postal address

This electronic signature is not valid for a referendum or initiative, and if necessary, please allow us to recontact you.

Progress

11424 Signatures

Latest signatures

Francis Gerber, 1203, 6 days ago

Petra Schelling, 3147, 1 week ago

Serge Marchon, CH-1700, 1 week ago

Nicole Siegert, 79110, 1 week ago

Anouchka Finger, 1018, 1 week ago

Lisa Brodtbeck , 47179, 1 week ago

Daniel Thomann, 4938, 1 week ago

Marie-Jo Fumeaux, 1981, 1 week ago

Daniel Wieser Giacometti , 1544, 1 week ago

Raymond Bloch, 5070, 1 week ago

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 646

In short

8 key arguments for a vaccine moratorium (Link to the whole moratorium):
 

The RNA vaccination is an experimental techique, developed in great urgency and which has never been subjected to any substantiated and verified long-term scientific studies.

The RNA vaccination project has involved many simplifications and short cuts of the authorisation procedures which do not respect the «precautionary principle» essental to medical research.

RNA «vaccines» do not meet the WHO’s definition of a «vaccine». They are genetic therapy products of which the long term effects on the human organism are not at all known.

RNA vaccination involves unknown and under-investigated risks such as those of an overactivated immune system or the inverse transcription of RNA to DNA that can lead to DNA modifications transmissible through heridity. This is without even considering the risk of creating a new, mutated virus which is even more pathogenic.

The secondary effects of RNA vaccines on the general population have never been scientifically studied over the long term. We have no idea what the secondary effects could be upon vulnerable sections of the population such as children, the elderly and those suffering from polymorbidities.

The RNA vaccination leads to a modification of the human genetic heritage, a process that is illegal according to laws on genetic engineering.

A great many unknowns remain concerning RNA vaccines, beginning with the exact composition of these complex products (adjuvant substances, stabilisers, etc.) and their interactions with seasonal viruses.

The pharmaceutical producers of RNA «vaccines» benefit from judicial immunity which nullifies in advance any legal actions taken by citizens in cases of vaccinal accidents.

 


 

PETITION IN SUPPORT OF A MORATORIUM FROM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS CONCERNING THE RNA VACCINE:

 

We support the initiative launched by doctors and health care professionals calling for an immediate moratorium on RNA vaccine.

The aim of this moratorium is to highlight all the concerns over the effectiveness, safety and scientific validity of these new types of “vaccine”.

By adding your electronic signature, you can support this moratorium and help its circulation and success !

MSLC (Mouvement Suisse pour la Liberté Citoyenne), www.mslc.ch
Tous-plus
Les Amis de la Constitution, www.les-amis-de-la-constitution.ch
Le Collectif Citoyen de Neuchâtel
Réseau choix vaccinal, www.impfentscheid.ch/fr

 

MORATORIUM:

« To Federal Councillor Alain Berset,
To Mme Anne Lévy, director of the Federal Office of Public Health,
To Mr Stefan Kuster, Head of the Division of Transmittable Diseases,
To Mr Raimund Bruhin, Director of Swissmedic,
To the Cantonal Doctors,

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Given that the promises concerning the effectiveness of the forthcoming RNA vaccines originate only from the press releases of pharmaceutical companies’ laboratories and not from any detailed scientific communication,

Given that these RNA products are being offered less than a year after the appearance of the first reported cases of the Covid19 virus, when the normal development period of a vaccine is at least several years; and while the trials for Sars Cov 1 and Mers, two viruses preceding and similar to Sars Cov 2, where interrupted because of serious undesirable effects,

Given the fact that the simplification of, and short cuts taken with, the authorisation procedure violate the precautionary principle,

Given that RNA vaccines are not, according to the World Health Organisation, classified as traditional vaccines but as products involving genetic therapy containing nucleic acids, and that these RNA products might not prevent contagion as they do not introduce attenuated or inactivated virus into the cells according to long established vaccine procedures,

Given that this technique, which does not immunise the patient, has never been tested on humans, and that it stimulates the cellular production of viral proteins, without us knowing whether these will later be recognised by the human organism,

Given that at the present time we are unaware of the secondary effects of these RNA products for those individuals who have already contracted Covid19 or are asymptomatic carriers,

Given that human beings must be protected against abusive use of medically assisted human reproduction and genetic engineering (art. 119 al. 1 CF) and that the Swiss Confederation has legislated on the use of human germ and genetic heritage (In doing so, it seeks to assure the protection of human dignity, the personality and the family, respecting in particular the following principle (art. 119, al. 2, CF): non-human genetic heritage and germs cannot be transferred into or merged with the human germ heritage (art. 119, al. 2, lit b. CF)),

Given the potential risk of facilitating antibodies that could lead to an overactive immune system, and the risk of inverse transcription of RNA to DNA, with modifications of our DNA which would then be transmissible through inheritance,

Given the fact that trials of the vaccine are carried out on young subjects in good health, and that the priority target groups for RNA vaccination are the elderly and handicapped in institutions, often suffering from numerous co-morbidities, and therefore the most likely to develop undesirable side effects,

Given the unpredictable possibility of generating a mutated and more pathogenic virus,

Given the fact that the composition of these “vaccines”, adjuvant substances and stabilizers is unknown to us,

Given that the current sanitary situation in which we find ourselves is without precedent and very difficult to manage, it is even more risky to add to it a massive new vaccination campaign filled with “unknowns” and involving too few technical details,

And finally, given that there might be interactions with seasonal epidemics,

The sum total of these factors represents a double source of danger for the citizen: firstly, through the epidemiological situation described above, but also secondly by the planned administration of this type of vaccine. It is medically unacceptable to subject the population to such a double risk. This is even more so considering the existence of other known vaccine techniques, which are less effective in the percentage of vaccine coverage they provide, but which are currently being improved.

It is important to remember that the political and sanitary authorities in charge of the anti-Covid19 vaccination programme will be judicially responsible for any case of potential harmful or lethal side effects. As for the pharmaceutical companies, they benefit from judicial immunity, despite being primarily responsible for possible vaccination accidents.

Here is Article 1 of the Nuremberg Code (1947):

 « The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. »

As a result of all the reasons detailed above, we, doctors, pharmacists, nurses, carers, health professionals, of independent status or working in organisations, conscious of our responsibility, demand an IMMEDIATE MORATORIUM on the introduction of a vaccine utilising RNA technology. We demand this moratorium until demonstrable clinical data is provided in writing that answers questions concerning secondary and vaccinal effects at an Evidential Level 1, and that no vaccine of this type will be administered to any Swiss citizen during the entire course of this moratorium in order to guarantee the protection of their health.

According to the rights conferred and protected by the Nuremberg Code, the Code of Medical Deontology and the Hippocratic Oath.
 

Le COLLECTIF SANTÉ, www.collectif-santé.ch

Les MEDECINS CITOYENS, [email protected]

COLLECTIF ALETHEIA, www.aletheia-scimed.ch

Official page of the moratorium : www.collectif-santé.ch/moratoire-fr »

 


 

The Petition committee

 

MSLC (Mouvement Suisse pour la Liberté Citoyenne), www.mslc.ch
Tous-plus
Les Amis de la Constitution, www.les-amis-de-la-constitution.ch
Le Collectif Citoyen de Neuchâtel
Réseau choix vaccinal, www.impfentscheid.ch/fr

 


 

The financing of this petition is advanced by members of the committee’s associations. We are greatful for every donation. The MSLC (Mouvement Suisse pour la Liberté Citoyenne) takes care to collect them in order to reimburse the costs, then to distribute them among the other associations.

 

CHF
.00

 
PostFinance Account contact details:

Association MSLC, Genève
IBAN : CH29 0900 0000 1563 3956 8
BIC : POFICHBEXXX
 


 

Share the link Swiss-Freedom.ch with friends and aquaintenances: www.swiss-freedom.ch


 

Sign the peition

We take protecting your personal details very seriously and these will remain fully confidential.

Add postal address

This electronic signature is not valid for a referendum or initiative, and if necessary, please allow us to recontact you.

Progress

11424 Signatures

Latest signatures

Francis Gerber, 1203, 6 days ago

Petra Schelling, 3147, 1 week ago

Serge Marchon, CH-1700, 1 week ago

Nicole Siegert, 79110, 1 week ago

Anouchka Finger, 1018, 1 week ago

Lisa Brodtbeck , 47179, 1 week ago

Daniel Thomann, 4938, 1 week ago

Marie-Jo Fumeaux, 1981, 1 week ago

Daniel Wieser Giacometti , 1544, 1 week ago

Raymond Bloch, 5070, 1 week ago

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 646

ErstunterzeichnerInnen

...

News

Hier finden Sie weiterführende Informationen zum Thema.

No posts yet.